GE
GULFPORT ENERGY CORP (GPOR)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 2025 came in ahead of company expectations with premium realizations (+$0.45/Mcfe vs Henry Hub) and reaffirmed full‑year 2025 guidance; adjusted EBITDA was $218.3M and adjusted FCF was $36.6M, despite front‑loaded capex and winter‑elevated unit costs .
- Versus S&P Global consensus, GPOR delivered a revenue beat and a modest EPS beat, while reported (S&P standardized) EBITDA tracked below consensus due to definitional differences versus company‑reported adjusted EBITDA. Revenue $338.1M vs $320.7M consensus (+5.4%); EPS 5.63 vs 5.23 (+7.6%); S&P EBITDA $77.6M vs $202.5M; company adjusted EBITDA $218.3M (see estimates section for definitions and sources) .
- Sequential volumes dipped as planned to 929.3 MMcfe/d on Q1 turn‑in‑line cadence and liquids mix, but management reiterated a ~20% increase in average daily natural gas production by 4Q25 vs 1Q25 and maintained 2025 production guidance of 1,040–1,065 MMcfe/d .
- Capital allocation remained shareholder‑friendly: $60M of buybacks in Q1 (341K shares at ~$176) with $356M remaining authorization; liquidity stood at ~$906M and the $1.1B borrowing base was reaffirmed post‑quarter .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Premium gas realizations and marketing uplift: realized price of $4.11/Mcfe before hedges, a $0.45/Mcfe premium to Henry Hub; CFO highlighted differentials “ahead of analyst consensus expectations” and better than the narrow end of guidance .
- Operational execution and efficiency: drilling footage/day improved ~28% vs FY24; record continuous pumping hours (97.5 and 105.5 hours) and <$900/ft Utica D&C target achieved; the Kage pad delivered early rates nearly 2x the high‑performing Lake VII pad due to design/flowback optimizations .
- Capital returns and balance sheet: $60M buybacks in Q1; trailing 12‑month net leverage ~0.9x; liquidity ~$906M; lenders reaffirmed the $1.1B borrowing base with $1.0B elected commitments .
What Went Wrong
- Planned sequential production decline: average production fell to 929.3 MMcfe/d (from 1.06 Bcfe/d in Q4) due to turn‑in‑line timing and liquids mix; management acknowledged the trade‑off with a front‑loaded program and shorter liquids plateaus .
- Elevated unit cash costs seasonally: cash operating costs were $1.31/Mcfe, with winter weather impacts; LOE rose to $0.24/Mcfe (vs $0.18 y/y) and TGPC to $0.99/Mcfe (vs $0.90 y/y) .
- GAAP optics: a small net loss ($0.5M) despite strong adjusted EBITDA, and S&P standardized EBITDA tracked below consensus while company‑reported adjusted EBITDA rose to $218.3M (definitional differences; see Estimates Context) .
Financial Results
GAAP financials vs prior periods (S&P Global)
* Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Non‑GAAP and cash flow metrics (company‑reported)
Production, realizations, and unit costs
Production by area (Q1 2025)
Capital and balance sheet highlights (Q1 2025)
- Incurred capex: $159.8M (operated D&C $148.6M; land $11.2M; plus ~$1.2M non‑op) .
- Liquidity: ~$906.5M (cash $5.3M + ~$901.1M revolver availability) .
- Debt/LCs: $35.0M revolver, $25.7M 2026 notes, $650.0M 2029 notes, $63.9M LCs .
Guidance Changes
Note: Management reaffirmed full‑year guidance on the call and in the Q1 release .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “Gulfport began 2025 with strong momentum… shifted second‑half 2025 capital allocation towards natural gas drilling and reaffirmed full‑year guidance, driven primarily by a forecasted 20% growth in our natural gas volumes by the fourth quarter of 2025.” — John Reinhart .
- “Our all‑in realized price for the first quarter was $4.11 per Mcfe before the impact of cash‑settled derivatives… $0.45 above the NYMEX Henry Hub index price, highlighting the benefit of our diverse marketing portfolio.” — Michael Hodges .
- “The Kage [Utica condensate] is performing exceptionally well and delivering early rates nearly double those of the nearby Lake VII pad,” driven by frac design, facilities, and flowback strategy — John Reinhart .
- “We are reaffirming our full year operated drilling and completion capital guidance of $335 million to $355 million.” — John Reinhart .
- “We continue to forecast robust adjusted free cash flow generation during 2025 and… plan to return substantially all… through common stock repurchases.” — John Reinhart .
Q&A Highlights
- Front‑loaded capex and production seasonality: Management does not “regret” the approach; Q1 lower volumes were planned; shift to dry gas should smooth plateaus and accelerate cash flow in peak pricing seasons .
- 2025 program optimization and early 2026 setup: Deferring a Marcellus pad to 2026 and adding a dry‑gas Utica pad positions GPOR for a constructive gas macro in 2026; no specific 2026 guidance yet .
- Netbacks/takeaway: GPOR will evaluate projects like Borealis expansion on a netback basis; uncommitted volumes provide flexibility to capture premium opportunities .
- Cost/efficiency trajectory: <$900/ft Utica D&C is being achieved; further downside possible if current efficiency gains hold .
- Hedging philosophy: Strategy unchanged; strong balance sheet enables strategic, upside‑preserving collars on gas; liquids hedging limited given revenue mix .
- M&A posture: Open but high bar; preference for opportunities with undeveloped inventory that compete with buybacks and organic returns .
Estimates Context
S&P Global consensus vs reported (Q1 2025):
- Revenue: $320.73M consensus vs $338.14M actual → Beat by $17.41M (+5.4%)*
- Primary EPS (S&P normalized): 5.23 consensus vs 5.63 actual → Beat by 0.40 (+7.6%)*
- EBITDA (S&P standardized): $202.51M consensus vs $77.64M actual → Miss (-$124.87M; -61.6%)*
- Company‑reported adjusted EBITDA: $218.3M (non‑GAAP) .
Notes:
- S&P “Primary EPS” and S&P “EBITDA” are standardized/normalized constructs which differ from company non‑GAAP metrics; GPOR’s adjusted EBITDA of $218.3M better reflects management’s operating performance framework .
- CFO cited realized pricing and differentials that were ahead of consensus as key supports in Q1 .
* Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Reaffirmed 2025 plan with premium realizations and strong marketing execution; expect production to build through the year with ~20% higher natural gas volumes by 4Q25 vs 1Q25, a key setup for an improving 2026 gas macro .
- Program optimization (dry‑gas shift in late 2025; Marcellus deferral) should enhance 2026 gas leverage while preserving 2025 liquids‑driven margin uplift; watch for updated TIL cadence and Q2/Q3 volumes .
- Operational momentum is tangible: drilling/completions records, <$900/ft Utica costs, and standout Kage pad performance support well‑level returns and potential capex per‑ft downside .
- Near‑term headwinds (Q1 seasonal costs, planned volume trough) appear transient; per‑unit costs are expected to decline as volumes ramp through 2025 within guided ranges .
- Capital returns remain front‑and‑center (substantially all adjusted FCF to buybacks), underpinned by $906M liquidity and an unanimously reaffirmed $1.1B borrowing base .
- Basis/marketing is a differentiator; management will selectively add takeaway where netbacks improve economics, leveraging uncommitted volumes .
- Estimate revisions: Street models may raise 2025 realized price assumptions/differentials and modestly increase Q2–Q4 volumes; be mindful of metric definitions when comparing EBITDA prints (S&P standardized vs company adjusted) .
Additional Notes
- We searched for a Q1 2025 “8‑K 2.02” item; none was available in the document catalog for the quarter. We relied on the Q1 press release and the full earnings call transcript instead .
- Scheduling press release confirms timing/logistics for the May 7 call .